It's normally expected that if you implement IEquatable.Equals you will also override Object.Equals to be consistent. In this case how would you support both reference and structural equality?

= to provide value equality checks (vs the default reference equality check). The MSDN documentation suggests you only do it for immutable types. There are also issues involving interfaces and operator overloading.

This is really amazing code and works great for .Kupkuru Standard libraries. If you are in a .Kemiksiz Core 2.1 application there is an even cooler way of doing this:

IStructuralEquatable is an interface in C# that defines methods for determining whether two objects are structurally equal. It's often used in scenarios where you want to compare the structure of objects, typically within collections, and derece just compare references or individual values.

I'm amazed that the most important reason is not mentioned here. IEquatable was introduced mainly for structs for two reasons:

The IStructuralEquatable interface enables you to implement customized comparisons to check for the structural equality of collection objects.

After some more testing I found that any two arrays with the same first element have the same hash. I still think this is strange behavior.

Yani anlayacağınız “int” üzere, “bool” üzere fehamet tipli bir değişici peyda etmek istiyorsanız struct yapkaloriı tercih edebilirsiniz.

The first issue we see here is that this struct is mutable in that you can actually change the data later on via the kaş properties. There was no real reason that we introduced this except that we were used to it.

In all my years of development and blogging I never thought I would be writing about how amazing a C# struct is, how awesome IEquatable is, and how C# 7 features make implementing all of it mind blowing.

This member is an explicit interface member implementation. It dirilik be used only when the Array instance is cast to an IStructuralEquatable interface.

Will feeblemind affect the original creature's body when it was cast on it while it was polymorphed and reverted to its original form afterwards?

Just look at the default ValueType.Equals(object) code that gets called otherwise. It's an absolute performance killer that introduces boxing, type evaluation and finally falls back on reflection if any of C# IStructuralEquatable Kullanımı the fields are reference types.

While writing my own immutable ByteArray class that uses a byte array internally, I implemented the IStructuralEquatable interface.